Legal Doesn’t Mean Sustainable-neither does it always mean just, fair nor right. It simply means that, 'we can do this for the time being, with the authorities' permission'.
Our bio regional habitats around the globe deserve to be restored. Habitat destruction is definitely a product of the fossil fuel planet raping business model causing our eminent climate crisis. That said, they should be restored for their own sake. The 20, billion trees that it would take to offset United States emissions a loan on an annual basis, bio chart and other claims about habitat restoration helping with climate reparation are simply balderdash
I think connecting the two is a mistake. The contribution to the climate crisis is minimal as in statistically insignificant and the deniers will also soon have the same attitude towards extinction and Eco habitat destruction.
Legal Doesn’t Mean Sustainable-neither does it always mean just, fair nor right. It simply means that, 'we can do this for the time being, with the authorities' permission'.
Our bio regional habitats around the globe deserve to be restored. Habitat destruction is definitely a product of the fossil fuel planet raping business model causing our eminent climate crisis. That said, they should be restored for their own sake. The 20, billion trees that it would take to offset United States emissions a loan on an annual basis, bio chart and other claims about habitat restoration helping with climate reparation are simply balderdash
I think connecting the two is a mistake. The contribution to the climate crisis is minimal as in statistically insignificant and the deniers will also soon have the same attitude towards extinction and Eco habitat destruction.
imho